Chanel

Paris-Biarritz by Chanel

by

Chanel’s Les Eaux de Chanel line is one that I’ve been testing out for a while now. I’ve become familiar with all of the scents and am now writing up my full reviews of each. Today’s entry is Paris-Biarritz. How does it smell? Does it last long? Is this one worth a try?

My Verdict

Paris-Biarritz is a cold, refreshing citrus fragrance that opens with juicy grapefruit, mandarin, and a noticeable lemon-like sharpness. A subtle aquatic quality gives the opening an almost icy ocean-air effect, while neroli adds a green and lightly spicy undertone.

Overall, Paris-Biarritz smells pleasant and works well as a casual spring or summer daytime fragrance.

Chanel Paris-Biarritz Overview

Notes include: grapefruit, mandarin, lily-of-the-valley, vetiver, musk, neroli, patchouli

Click here to try: Paris-Biarritz by Chanel

🌊 Paris-Biarritz by Chanel — At a Glance
Fragrance Family Fresh Citrus Floral Aquatic
Key Notes Grapefruit, Mandarin Orange, Neroli, Lily-of-the-Valley, Vetiver, Musk, Patchouli
Season Spring, Summer, Warm Weather
Occasion Casual Daytime Wear, Work, Around Town, Semi-Formal Events
Longevity Around 4–5 hours, even with some over-spraying
Sillage Moderate initially, then light and fairly close to the skin
Rating ★★★☆☆ 6.3 / 10
Quick Verdict A cold and refreshing citrus fragrance with grapefruit, mandarin, neroli, soft florals, and a subtle watery character. The juicy opening is the highlight, while the later soapy, green, and musky dry down is pleasant but fairly familiar. It is clean, versatile, and well suited to warm-weather daytime wear, but weak 4–5-hour longevity and Chanel pricing prevent it from being a must-have.

My Full Review

Paris-Biarritz begins with its citrus notes out in full force. According to Chanel, it is grapefruit and mandarin orange. But, I definitely pick up on a lemon note, pretty clearly. To me, it actually starts off the strongest.

The citrus is juicy, refreshing, but very cold. Almost like they threw in an iced accord. The composition does have a bit of an aquatic note in there. Almost oceanic, in how it comes across. Now, it isn’t super powerful, but I get it each time I spray this perfume.

Beyond all of that, the neroli not adds to the citrus, while also creating a green and spicy fresh undertone to Biarritz.

Once the juiciness of the citrus has faded, this becomes drier, greener, and more floral. Neroli and lily of the valley are the floral notes here. Paris-Biarritz becomes a balanced mix of those along with some ample vetiver, musk, and patchouli.

It’s a light soapy citrus with woody, green, and musky aromas exchanging places during the dry down. It’s something I’ve experienced with plenty of other scents, but the watery/sea vibe I get, does give it some distinction.

Sillage, Longevity, and Versatility

Sillage wise, this one is pretty moderate at first. Then, becoming lighter for the rest of the wear. Now, the citrus notes can initially come on strong, as it has that usual sharpness. That is short-lived.

For the rest of the wear, it is going to sit close to the skin, 2-3 feet away. Not a powerhouse, like most summertime citrus perfumes. I do wish that it had a little bit more strength behind it.

The longevity also isn’t very good. I can squeeze 4-5 hours out of Paris-Biarritz, with a bit of over-spraying. That’s about all it is going to provide. Not shocking for the type of perfume this is, but I’d expect more.

Seasonally, this is a warm day wear for spring and summertime. It is a unisex fragrance, that sort of starts off more masculine, and finishes more floral and feminine. It’s about the same impression as something like, Neroli Portofino by Tom Ford.

If you can wear that, this will be fine.

I would stick to daytime wear. Around town casually, maybe to work, or semi-formal events. It’s attractive and clean, but not anything that would be considered sexy.

Overall Impressions of Paris-Biarritz

Overall, do I like Paris-Biarritz? Yes, I do. It’s just my least favorite of the Les Eaux de Chanel line of perfumes. Go after another one of those on the list.

The aroma itself is nice.  I really like the citrus top, with its cold juiciness. The rest of the wear, it pretty standard issue. It smells like a bunch of other stuff, which is fine, but not at Chanel prices. Plus, there are better options than this from the brand.

The longevity here is only 5 hours at best, which doesn’t lend itself to wanting to acquire a full bottle. If that were beefed up, I certainly wouldn’t be opposed to it. Though, I can’t say that this one that I’d constantly be wanting to wear.

It’s nice, with how it smells. The performance is meh. Just not too much to get excited about with this one. Not terrible, just not a must have.

Paris-Edimbourg by Chanel

by

Paris-Edimbourg is a part of Les Eaux de Chanel, a newer series from the French luxury brand. I got a hold of sample of each of these fragrances to give a try, over the past six months or so, in order to post my review of them. How does Edimbourg smell? How long does it last? Is it even worth a try?

My Verdict

Paris-Edimbourg is a crisp, cold, green-woody Chanel fragrance with a bright juniper and cypress opening, softened by lavender, musk, cedar, vetiver, and a light touch of vanilla.

It has a clean, outdoorsy, slightly rainy forest feel that leans traditionally masculine while still being wearable as a unisex scent. The performance is solid but not amazing, with moderate projection and around 6–7 hours of longevity.

Overall, it’s a stylish, refreshing, and unique Chanel, especially for fans of green, woody, aromatic scents.

🌲 Paris-Edimbourg by Chanel — At a Glance
Fragrance Family Aromatic Woody Green
Key Notes Lavender, Musk, Juniper, Cypress, Vanilla, Vetiver, Cedar
Season Spring, Summer, Autumn
Occasion Casual Wear, Semi-Formal, Daytime, Office, Clean Everyday Wear
Longevity About 6-7 hours
Sillage Moderate early on, then lighter and closer to the skin
Rating ★★★☆☆ 7.6 / 10
Quick Verdict A cold, clean, green-woody Chanel with juniper, cypress, lavender, cedar, vetiver, musk, and a touch of vanilla. Refreshing, outdoorsy, and well put together, though more of a like than a love unless you already enjoy forest-like aromatic scents.

Paris-Edimbourg Fragrance Overview

Notes include: lavender, musk, juniper, cypress, vanilla, vetiver, and cedar

Click here to try: Paris-Edimbourg at Chanel

My Full Review

Before we get into my own review, let’s see how Chanel describes this one: An aromatic, woody fragrance that conjures the wild and majestic landscape of the Scottish Highlands, where Gabrielle Chanel found solace in nature.

Paris-Edimbourg opens up with a very bright and fresh greenish profile. There does seem to be a bit of citrus up top, that may just be unlisted. However, the fragrance does have that sort of quality to it.

Along with that, juniper and cypress are very present early on. It has a gin-like quality, effervescence, but much woodier than the drink itself. This gives off strong forest vibes, a bit rainy, but the air is clean and crisp.

The lavender note softens and lends to the fairly masculine sort of soapiness that Edimbourg has. Still, this is a unisex scent that leans masculine, unlike the others in the Les Eaux de Chanel series.

As it moves along, the cypress tones down to my nose, and I get more of the vetiver and some cedar. The whole perfume feels cold and attractive with a classical style. Also, the greenish aroma diminishes as it dries down.

Lavender will become more dominant, with the remaining woodsiness, and a touch of vanilla sweetness/creaminess. Not too much vanilla, but it does make an appearance. Towards the end, it is a musky lavender and woods scent.

Sillage, Longevity, and Versatility

Sillage wise, its pretty moderate, even early on. It doesn’t project huge on my skin or even a t-shirt. Maybe 4-6 feet, at its maximum. Then, it is a lighter scent that will hang around the skin, but it’s noticeable.

It sticks on me for 6-7 hours, depending on the day. The longevity isn’t amazing, but this Chanel is quite serviceable. But, you might want a little more for the price tag.

Seasonally, it’s a spring through autumn wear. I would like this as a change of pace on the hotter days. Since you get a cold and refreshing green aroma, early on. It’s not too heavy and won’t get bogged down. But, could be equally as nice in the more moderate temperatures.

Again, it is unisex, but leans traditionally masculine. If you like forest and woody fragrance, this could be a nice pick for a woman.

I would wear it casually or semi-formally. It’s more of a clean fragrance than anything all that ‘sexy’. Not a club beast. Something that is relaxed while still being well put together, as a whole.

 

Overall Impressions of Paris-Edimbourg

Overall, do I like Paris-Edimbourg? I do. It’s my third favorite in the Les Eaux des Chanel line. For me, it’s a like, not a love. But, I’m also not a massive fan of greenish/woody scents.

The opening is interesting with the juniper and cypress out in full force. It does have a pretty sharp cleanliness about it. The lavender will soften it up from there, but expect a bright and really fresh aromatic sort of perfume.

The performance is just okay. Nothing special, but it never felt entirely weak on me, either. It’s acceptable and pretty good in the longevity department.

Paris-Edimbourg probably isn’t ever going to be a super mass appealing fragrance. Though, it is one that will for sure have its dedicated fans. If this is your style, the perfume is one that I would get a hold of to try out.

Solid and enjoyable.

Chanel Gabrielle vs Essence Comparison

by

Chanel released Gabrielle back in 2017 and it quickly gained some measure of popularity. A few years later, it introduced Gabrielle Essence as a follow up perfume. It can be tough to decide between the two, when you’re wanting to make a purchase.

So, I’m going to break things down based on my experience. Which is the better perfume? Which has better performance?

Quick Overview

My Verdict

Chanel Gabrielle Essence is the better fragrance overall. It opens smoother and fruitier than the original, with peach, citrus, coconut, orange blossom, and jasmine creating a more balanced start.

Gabrielle EDP is still pretty once the florals settle in, but Essence performs slightly better and has the more enjoyable scent profile.

Category Chanel Gabrielle EDP Chanel Gabrielle Essence Winner
Opening Opens with sparkling citrus, pear, orange, pink pepper, orange blossom, and ylang-ylang. The opening is bright, but also the weaker part of the fragrance. Opens with juicier fruit, peach, citrus, coconut, orange blossom, and jasmine. It feels smoother, clearer, and better balanced early on. Gabrielle Essence
Projection Moderate projection. It is not a powerhouse and can spend time closer to the skin. Also moderate, but reaches a slightly higher peak than the original EDP. Gabrielle Essence
Longevity Lasts around 7-7.5 hours on skin. Lasts just over 8 hours, giving it a slight advantage. Gabrielle Essence
Versatility Very versatile, especially for spring and summer. Works casually, semi-formally, and in most everyday situations. Equally versatile. Best in spring, but also works in summer and autumn as a pretty daily wear perfume. Tie
Overall Scent A very good floral perfume once jasmine and tuberose take over, but it is a step behind Essence overall. The better scent overall. It has a better fruity opening and a more balanced floral blend of orange blossom, jasmine, and ylang-ylang. Gabrielle Essence

Tale of the Tape: Chanel Gabrielle vs Essence

Gabrielle

Notes include: jasmine, ylang-ylang, orange blossom, tuberose, musk, citrus, pear

Click here to try: Chanel Gabrielle For Women Eau De Parfume Spray 3.4 Ounces

Read my review: Gabrielle EDP

Gabrielle Essence

Notes include: tuberose, orange blossom, ylang-ylang, jasmine, coconut, peach, citrus

Click here to try: Gabrielle Essence by Chanel Eau De Parfum Spray 3.4 oz / 100 ml (Women) 

Read my review: Gabrielle Essence

Opening

Gabrielle opens with sparkling citrus notes (grapefruit, pear, orange) and a pink pepper spice. This is  alongside a floral  mix of orange blossom and ylang-ylang.

Even after me giving this Chanel multiple tries, the opening remains the fragrance’s weakest point.

I’m not usually a huge floral fan, but when those notes take over, this becomes a much better wear.

Fortunately, the transition doesn’t take long. Around 30 minutes in, jasmine and tuberose join the mix, creating a floral bouquet that’s much more appealing.

It’s focused on white petals rather than green stems. The overall character maintains a sweet and bright undercurrent that continues throughout the wear.

Meanwhile, Essence kicks off with some juicier fruits, and not the same sparkling brightness or sharpness of Gabrielle.

It lacks the original’s sparkling brightness but delivers better, juicier fruit – peach and citrus smoothed by white florals, with coconut emerging deeper into the wear.

There’s peach and coconut, along with the citrus notes, this time. There is also more of the orange blossom and jasmine, leading the way versus the original.

The fruity opening is improved but shorter-lived, quickly transitioning to florals. The key difference is Essence emphasizes orange blossom and jasmine upfront, while the EDP featured jasmine and tuberose. Here, tuberose plays a minimal role.

Which is better? I like Essence much more in the early stages. It feels more balanced, delicious, and the floral notes are the ones that I like better.

Gabrielle Essence opens much clearer than the original EDP, where notes blur together initially.  That makes for a better experience at the start.

Edge: Essence

Projection

Neither one of these fragrances is a powerhouse. Actually, they’re both fairly moderate and can spend time being skin scents. However, Essence reaches a slightly higher peak than does Gabrielle EDP.

It’s really not a huge difference, but noticeable.

Edge: Essence

Longevity

With Gabrielle, I got 7-7.5 hours of wear on the skin. Again, it’s not a powerhouse throughout, but it did hang around. Gabrielle Essence lasted just over 8, for another slight advantage.

Edge: Essence

Versatility

I don’t see a difference here. Both are wildly versatile, mostly in the spring and summer months.

You can go casual or more formal (but neither are super stuffy or serious). They have very pretty and attractive profiles.

Seasonally, Gabrielle and Gabrielle Essence is at their best in spring, though summer and autumn work well too.

In warmer spring air, these Chanel perfumes really hang beautifully and you catch whiffs of the full floral array. That bouquet effect is great.

Gabrielle Essence makes a versatile daily wear, just like the original. It’s not super formal and actually serves better as a casual or semi-formal scent.

It’s lovely and attractive, but not a super sexy club beast. You really wouldn’t offend anyone wearing them. These Chanel perfumes are pretty rather than provocative, making it a safe wear for most occasions.

So, the similarities don’t make much of a distinction. Tie.

Edge: Push

Overall Scent

I think that each of these fragrances is a very good release by Chanel. Gabrielle EDP settles into a floral bouquet with some remaining sweetness. It does everything well, even if it is a step behind Essence in many categories.

I think that it ultimately comes down to which floral notes you prefer, as the weighting is different between these perfumes.

With Gabrielle EDP, tuberose and jasmine play a larger role together, in the dry down.

Meanwhile, Essence doesn’t have as strong of a tuberose. It more evenly splits between orange blossom, jasmine, and ylang-ylang.

Personally, I think that Gabrielle Essence is the better fragrance all around. It doesn’t blow the original out of the water, but does make marked improvements in comparison.

It’s a beautiful perfume that improves on the original, which I already liked. Essence is a very well-balanced floral with a great fruity opening that avoids being over the top.

I prefer how the floral notes are weighted here compared to the original. Performance is somewhat better, though it could’ve been bumped up further. It’s not bad by any means, just not outstanding. Both longevity and projection sit above average.

This is more than just a solid Chanel entry. It does everything well and has the versatility to become a daily wear for many women. It feels more modern than some of their past releases, even if it’s not entirely unique.

Winner: Gabrielle Essence

Who Should Buy Chanel Gabrielle EDP?

Buy Chanel Gabrielle EDP if you prefer a brighter, sparkling citrus-floral opening and a dry down with more jasmine and tuberose. It is still a pretty, versatile perfume for spring, summer, casual wear, semi-formal settings, and everyday use.

Who Should Buy Chanel Gabrielle Essence?

Buy Chanel Gabrielle Essence if you want the better overall choice. It has a juicier fruity opening, smoother white florals, slightly better projection, and slightly better longevity. It is the safer pick if you want a polished daily wear Chanel floral.

FAQ: Chanel Gabrielle vs Gabrielle Essence

Which is better, Chanel Gabrielle or Gabrielle Essence?

Chanel Gabrielle Essence is better overall. It has the stronger opening, slightly better performance, and a more balanced floral profile.

Does Gabrielle Essence last longer than Gabrielle EDP?

Yes. Gabrielle EDP lasts around 7-7.5 hours, while Gabrielle Essence lasts just over 8 hours.

Does Gabrielle Essence project better than Gabrielle?

Yes, but only slightly. Both are moderate performers, but Essence reaches a slightly higher peak.

What does Chanel Gabrielle smell like?

Chanel Gabrielle smells like citrus, pear, orange blossom, ylang-ylang, jasmine, tuberose, musk, and soft sweetness. It becomes better as the floral notes settle in.

What does Chanel Gabrielle Essence smell like?

Gabrielle Essence smells like peach, citrus, coconut, orange blossom, jasmine, ylang-ylang, and soft white florals. It is fruity, floral, smooth, and slightly creamy.

Which one is more floral?

Both are floral, but the floral balance is different. Gabrielle leans more toward jasmine and tuberose, while Essence spreads more evenly across orange blossom, jasmine, and ylang-ylang.

Which one is better for spring?

Both are excellent for spring. Gabrielle Essence gets the edge because its fruity opening and floral balance feel smoother and prettier.

Is Chanel Gabrielle Essence good for everyday wear?

Yes. Gabrielle Essence is very versatile and works well as a daily wear perfume, especially in spring, summer, and mild autumn weather.

Is Chanel Gabrielle a formal perfume?

Gabrielle can work in semi-formal settings, but it is not overly formal or serious. It is better as a pretty, versatile daily floral.

Should I buy Chanel Gabrielle or Gabrielle Essence?

Buy Gabrielle Essence if you want the better overall perfume. Buy Gabrielle EDP if you specifically prefer a brighter citrus opening and more jasmine-tuberose in the dry down.

Coco Mademoiselle vs. L’eau Privee

by

Coco Mademoiselle has launched a bunch of different flankers over the years. One of them, L’eau Privée, is one of the latest additions to the line. L’eau Privée is a nighttime/sleepwear version of the scent. I wanted to provide a comparison post, as plenty of people seem to have questions about the differences between these two.

Tale of the Tape: Coco Mademoiselle vs. L’eau Privee

Coco Mademoiselle

Notes include: orange, neroli, may rose, patchouli, vetiver, jasmine

Click here to try: Coco Mademoiselle

Read my full review: Coco Mademoiselle EDP

Coco Mademoiselle L’eau Privee

Notes include: rose, jasmine, mandarin orange, musk

Click here to try: CHANEL COCO MADEMOISELLE L’EAU PRIVÉE Eau Pour la Nuit Spray 1,70z

Read my full review: L’eau Privee

Opening

Mademoiselle EDP starts off with a strong blend of its orange citrus note, neroli, and patchouli. The opening stage is heavy on that orange, before ceding some ground to the floral heart, made up of jasmine and a bit of rose.

It’s bold and have a somewhat gourmand feeling, thanks to the pretty prevalent patchouli.

L’eau Privée opens up with the bright and juicy orange note that is found the EDP version. It doesn’t have the neroli note, but the jasmine and rose are there. Plus, the patchouli, but it is way toned down.

Which is better? They are obviously extremely similar, but I like the EDP’s scent a bit better in the opening act. L’eau Privée is light and not as sharp, which can be a nice change, but it doesn’t hit the same high mark.

It’s a less intrusive, but also less dynamic version of Mademoiselle eau de parfum.

Edge: Mademoiselle 

Projection

Coco Mademoiselle has a very strong sillage and its ability to project is outstanding. Even after all of this time, this Chanel EDP still has that same strength and hasn’t lost a step.

L’eau Privee has a moderate sillage upon first spraying. Though, as a nighttime scent that power is short lived and it is ultimately a softer fragrance.

This category is no contest. Mademoiselle L’eau Privee gets very light and airy once you’re past that immediate burst. Though, I can still smell it on me without issue.

Edge: Coco Mademoiselle

Longevity

Mademoiselle EDP has always lasted for over 10 hours on my skin. It gives an outstanding performance and takes a long time to settle into a skin scent.

Privee will go for four hours on my skin. The last two of those hours is a pure skin scent, that won’t be jumping out at you, in the slightest.

The performance between the two isn’t going to be a close call. L’eau Privee does give me more longevity than some people have said in their reviews of it. Still, it’s not supposed to be a powerhouse, and easily loses this category.

Edge: Mademoiselle

Versatility

Coco Mademoiselle can work in a wide variety of situations. I’d avoid the heat with it, go easy at the office, or just don’t use it in formal settings. Outside of that, the EDP can deliver.

L’eau Privee is one to use when you want to freshen up for a few hours with something light or to use before bed. That’s its best use case. But, it can work better in the heat than Mademoiselle.

Not that it’s going to last a long time, but the scent itself can hold up more in the spring and summer months, without starting to smell weird.

Edge: Mademoiselle

Overall Scent

This really isn’t a fair contest, as L’eau Privee is designed for more of a specific purpose versus the original EDP perfume.

However, it’s always a question that comes up from newer folks to Chanel, who don’t yet know the difference between these two scents.

If you want an all-purpose perfume, that has style and staying power; Coco Mademoiselle is a great choice overall and the clear choice in this comparison.

If you already like the style of Mademoiselle and want something the spray before bedtime…then maybe pick up L’eau Privee. That’s one of the only real uses for it. But if you want to shell out the money, go right ahead.

Maybe you use it during the summer months or a fragrance that you wear to the gym or something along those lines.

Some people seem to like to use it as a freshener, either for themselves or their bedroom. It’s a nice smelling scent. A lighter and fresh version of this line from Chanel. It’s just not going to become a signature perfume for anyone, unlike the eau de parfum.

Winner: Coco Mademoiselle

Coco Mademoiselle vs Mademoiselle Intense Comparison

by

Chanel’s Coco Mademoiselle line is insanely popular and the original EDP is still going strong after two decades. One of the flanker fragrances, that the brand released over the years is Coco Mademoiselle Intense. When in the market for one of these fragrances, the decision can often come down to which one of these you prefer. But, which one is actually better? Lasts longer? Is the one to buy?

Tale of the Tape: Coco Mademoiselle EDP vs. EDP Intense

Coco Mademoiselle

Notes include: orange, neroli, may rose, patchouli, vetiver, jasmine

Click here to try: Coco Mademoiselle

Read my full review: Coco Mademoiselle EDP

Coco Mademoiselle EDP Intense

Notes include: patchouli, amber, tonka bean, vanilla, orange, jasmine, rose, musk

Click here to try: Chanel Coco Mademoiselle Intense Eau De Parfum Spray, 1.7 Oz 

Read my review: Coco Mademoiselle Intense

Opening

Mademoiselle EDP starts off with a strong blend of its orange citrus note, neroli, and patchouli. The opening stage is heavy on that orange, before ceding some ground to the floral heart, made up of jasmine and a bit of rose.

It’s bold and have a somewhat gourmand feeling, thanks to the pretty prevalent patchouli. 

Mademoiselle Intense also features the citrus opening, but it is toned down quite a bit. What is amped up in the composition is the patchouli and amber note coming from the base. It is a more powerful opening than even the strength of the original. 

You will also get some of the vanilla, jasmine, and tonka bean. Though, they aren’t that strong early on.

Which is better? I prefer the citrus blend of orange and neroli, in the original Mademoiselle. You still get the patchouli note, but it is a bit more balanced in comparison.

Edge: Mademoiselle

Projection

Yes, Intense does open even stronger than the original EDP version. However, it doesn’t maintain that large of a distinction for the entirety of the wear.

Both of these are perfumes with a heavier sillage than your average popular perfume. They do each mellow out some over the first few hours, but keep up the ability to project or leave a scent trail quite well.

Intense does have the edge in this category, but it’s a lot closer than you’d expect from that opening.

Edge: Intense

Longevity

Both fragrances last on my skin for over 10 hours. I don’t really notice much, if any distinction, in this category. Perhaps, Intense will get you an extra bit of time, but I haven’t really experienced that.

Again, it’s another category that you might expect some massive or at least a substantial difference, but every time with either of these Coco Mademoiselle offerings it’s basically equal.

Edge: Push

 

Versatility

Again, I don’t see a distinction between these two Chanel scents, in this category. Neither is going to be something to wear in the heat, but are fine elsewhere.

Also, that can pretty much be worn whenever…maybe not the most formal settings, but otherwise they can work.

Mostly, autumn through springtime, as a daily wear. You can wear it to school, office, casually, or even for an evening out. Very versatile perfume, which is a part of the popularity of both Mademoiselle and Intense.

Edge: Push

Overall Scent

This is actually a close call, as both of these perfumes are great. Coco Mademoiselle Intense has more emphasis on the patchouli and amber aspects of the formula, with even a hint of extra rose. Though, the citrus is toned down.

It’s a bit stronger and has the same great performance as the original. However, I don’t think that it smells any better, and doesn’t bring all that much new to the table. 

Between them, I have a slight preference for the original EDP. It has the strong orange note which I enjoy and less of the patchouli which I have a lower preference for.

It’s not a huge win, and for those who want less citrus, you might consider the Intense or EDT versions versus the original. 

Or again, if you’re a bigger fan of that patchouli note. Other than that, there is a ton of overlap between these two fragrances. Most of the difference comes down to preference about how each note is weighted in the composition.

Winner: Mademoiselle