Ariana Grande Thank U Next vs. 2.0 Comparison

by

In the process of setting up to review most of the perfumes released by Ariana Grande, I realized that Thank U, Next now had a flanker scent called ‘2.0’. I’ve already had experience with the original and liked the way it smelled, so I had to order a decanted sample from eBay to check it out. Now, I will compare these two perfumes in this post, before deciding on which is the better bet.

Tale of the Tape: Thank U, Next vs. 2.0 Perfume

Thank U, Next

Notes include: pear, coconut water, macarons, pink rose, raspberry, musk

Click here to try: Ariana Grande Thank U, Next Perfume 3.4 oz

Read my full review: Thank U, Next

Thank U, Next 2.0

Notes include: pomegranate, strawberry, apple, marshmallow, musk, sandalwood, orchid, jasmine

Read my review: Thank U, Next 2.0

Opening

Thank U, Next kicks things off with the pear and raspberry notes coming out juicy and sparkling. This is paired with a sweet coconut water and warm baked macarons. It has a fresh and juicy aroma, but later will develop more of a warm creaminess.

I really like the two notes up top, but the coconut really comes through on my skin and its watery aroma gives this perfume a cleanliness that is very nice.

Meanwhile, 2.0 comes out with a bold and juicy accord of its own. Pomegranate, apple juice, and strawberry really run away with things early on and that’s what I mostly get. There is some marshmallow in there, but that will be more distinct later.

Which is the better opening act?

I really enjoy how Thank U, Next starts out, as it doesn’t give me the sour or pickle aroma that some people get. It’s actually lovely, on my skin.

That being said, I really like the strong and juicy fruit start to 2.0. It’s just a notch above the original and takes this category.

Edge: 2.0

Projection

I initially thought that 2.0 was going to have the stronger sillage, as it does start off with more power and a greater ability to project.

However, that quickly changes as Thank U, Next 2.0 really has a lighter moderate sillage for much of the wear. Then, becomes a skin scent. It’s actually pretty abrupt with how it just falls off.

The original has a strong sillage, not insanely powerful, but it does have a nice radius of aroma. Even when it dries down, it’s still in the upper range of moderate.

2.0 came out swinging, but loses this category.

Edge: Thank U, Next

Longevity

On my skin, the original will go 7-8.5 hours in total. Again, not a complete beast, but this Ariana Grande fragrance will get the job done.

Thank U, Next 2.0 is hitting the 5 hour range for me. That’s pretty disappointing, in comparison, and this perfume seems to have some performance issues on the whole.

Squeezing out 5 or 6 hours might not be the end of the world, for some people, but the original easily takes this one.

Edge: Thank U, Next

Versatility

I don’t really think there is much distinction in this category. Both of these perfumes are pretty versatile in terms of the climates, in which they can be worn. Spring and summer mostly, but I think 2.0 is better in hotter temperatures. While the original, would come across better when it’s cooler.

Casual and daytime wears, with the ability to venture into the night, depending on the occasion. Neither is a formal perfume, but have a wider age range of wear, versus some of the other Ariana Grande options.

No winner here.

Edge: Push

Overall Scent

It’s kind of funny how these two fragrances don’t really smell like one another. Sure, they share the musk note and have a very similar structure, but everything else is quite different.

When I first sprayed 2.0, I thought for sure that I would like it more so than the original. I like Thank U, Next and think it’s one of Ariana’s best, but 2.0 was about to take its place on the list.

Then, things changed pretty fast. Not that it turned into a bad fragrance, but just something that didn’t really have much that stood out.

First, much of the fruit notes up top fade away. Then, it’s about the marshmallow and musk, with floral highlights (mostly jasmine). Kind of well-tread territory for Ariana Grande perfumes.

Add to that, the performance isn’t all that good. The sillage turns weak and it hangs around for a mediocre amount of time.

Personally, I like the original Thank U, Next more overall. I get great performance from it and it projects from my skin well.

It also falters into a vague sweetness/musky stage later on, but you at least get plenty of time with the top notes. The raspberry, coconut, and pear notes are really nice. It’s semi-aquatic and has a sparkling essence.

Neither is too big on the floral notes, but I get more jasmine from 2.0 than I do the rose in the original.

To me, the first one is better. 2.0 seemed like it had a good shot, but it ultimately blew it. It’s not a bad scent, I like the way it smells in totality…it just loses this matchup.

I will say, that if you do get that pickle sort of smell from the original, 2.0 will be the better option if you must have one of them. But, I’d really just go find another perfume, if that’s the case.

Winner: Thank U, Next

Spicebomb Infrared vs Night Vision EDP

by

Viktor & Rolf have put out some newer Spicebomb flankers over the past year or so under the Infrared and Night Vision banners. As such, people are always comparing them or simply wondering what’s the difference between these colognes. For this post, I’m going to compare Spicebomb Infrared to Night Vision EDP (it’s better than EDT), and declare a winner of which one is best.

Tale of the Tape: Spicebomb Night Vision vs Infrared

Night Vision Eau de Parfum

Notes include: black spices, sage, lemon essence, fir balsam 

Read my Full Review: Spicebomb Night Vision EDP

Night Vision Infrared

Notes include: red berries, tobacco, habanero, cinnamon, saffron

Opening

Spicebomb much like it’s green bottle color suggests, does open up with a woodsy freshness and cooler profile. It’s got red pepper for spice, not as much sweetness as the EDT or Infrared, but also a lemon essence to separate it.

The fir and maybe some light benzoin give this a fresh and balsamic aroma, but when I move away from the skin, it can hang in the air as a fresh sweetness.

Infrared starts off hot and sweet. The cinnamon note pops, along with the red berry oil, and habenero pepper. I like that initial punch, very reminiscent of the original Spicebomb, but unique. The tobacco note from Extreme is also running around in this mix.

Which is better? It was fairly close at first. However, the more I tested Infrared, the more I gravitated toward it instead of Night Vision’s opening.

I love the spicy and sweet mix of notes. The cinnamon is a favorite spicy note of mine and the red berries is a nice touch.

Edge: Infrared

Projection

Night Vision is an eau de parfum with a higher fragrance concentration, while Infrared is an EDT. The sillage in the Night Vision is marginally better, but I don’t find there to be a huge difference.

Night Vision EDP starts off strong and settles into a moderate. While, Infrared probably reaches the upper limit of what could be considered moderate, and then settles.

Neither is a bomb, but both can reach that 4-6 foot radius mark without issue. Night Vision reaches a little further, on the whole.

Edge: Night Vision

Longevity

With Night Vision EDP, I get 7-8 hours of wear. Now, the last two hours or so, it’s very close to the skin. Still there, just not projecting very much at all.

Infrared seems to hit the 6-7 hour range, on my skin. Both of these are well within what could be called average to maybe slightly better than that.

Night Vision has the edge, but not by much even as an EDP.

Edge: Night Vision

Versatility

So, both of these fragrances are geared more towards autumn and winter. But, I’ve tested both of them in 75-80 degree Fahrenheit weather, with pretty high humidity and they held up well. I wouldn’t go much beyond that, but they’re pretty equal.

Actually, Infrared gets better when worn outdoors. It was actually what started me getting more into the cologne.

Neither of these is a formal wear. Can both be worn casually, more for younger guys, and can venture into the nightlife. Not really much difference.

Edge: Push

Overall Scent

Night Vision Eau de Parfum is a nice fragrance. It does have its moments during the wear, when I really enjoy it. When compared to Night Vision EDT, it absolutely is better (that’s my least favorite Spicebomb).

However, like its predecessor, it doesn’t run the table. The fir note is nice, giving it that woodsy feeling. The greenish freshness, the slight powdery and balsamic finish are good too. It just doesn’t completely hold my attention or wow me.

It’s fine, but not something I’m clamoring to own.

Spicebomb Infrared is my pick here. Since the original Spicebomb has lost much of its performance over the years, Infrared might be my second favorite now behind Extreme.

In fact, I might just pick up a full bottle of Infrared, since I don’t get enough cold days around here to justify owning another pure winter wear like Extreme.

I really love the opening act of the berries, habanero, and cinnamon. It reminds me of other ‘red hot’ style fragrances and it still has more of that original Spicebomb DNA when compared to the Night Vision scents.

It almost lost me during the dry down the first time I work it, as I was getting more tobacco and saffron with a sweet touch. But, when I wore it outside, Infrared created an awesome scent bubble around me.

The performance is okay and I hope they make a worthwhile EDP version of this cologne. As of now, I’ll happily take Infrared as is, and pretty easily in this head to head.

Winner: Spicebomb Infrared

God is a Woman by Ariana Grande

by

Ariana Grande’s perfume line has been growing steadily with new releases in the past year or so. Here in 2021, God is a Woman has been brought to market, along with a few others. Since I’m making my way through full reviews of Ariana’s fragrances, I grabbed a decant of this one, as I hadn’t actually smelled it before. How does it smell? Perform? Is it worth a buy?

God is a Woman Perfume Overview

Notes include: juicy pear, ambrette, orris, Turkish rose, cedar, vanilla

Buy it from Ulta: God is a Woman by Ariana Grande

My Full Review

Here’s how the scent is described: Empowered. Breathtaking. Natural. A breath of fresh air for the senses.

The advert for God is a Woman:

God is a Woman starts off with the juicy pear note, really shining through. It is basically the same one that is found in Thank U, Next; just this time it is paired with a mellowing ambrette instead of the coconut and raspberry mix.

It’s a juicy fruit aroma with a musky clean and some additional freshness coming from the cedar note, in the base. The muskiness from the ambrette isn’t overwhelming at all and is tempered from taking over by the rose and orris root notes.

The orris does add that slight powdery smell to God is a Woman, but it’s limited in both its size and scope.

The next phase to my nose, is when the rose shows up. It’s a seemingly brief appearance at the top of the ticket, but it is there. For some time, it actually smells like the second strongest note to me.  Mostly, the floral aromas are going to play third or forth fiddle in the composition.

God is a Woman isn’t a very complex scent. You pretty much know what you’re going to get for the rest of the wear, an hour or two in.

The pear is dominant throughout. The musky ambrette and cedar provide the secondary freshness. A light vanilla note for a bit of creamy sweetness.

This one isn’t heavy the juiciness and freshness give it a semi-aquatic wateriness, which keeps God is a Woman light and enjoyable.

Sillage, Longevity, and Versatility

Sillage wise, this isn’t a powerhouse. It does stick close to the skin for most of the wear, but the performance issues that I’ve seen people talking about are overblown. At least on me.

After the initial sprays, it will have nice radius of fragrance. This will quickly move in and stick to around 2-3 feet from the wearer. Testing it out on t-shirts and I get the same results. It’s a softer scent, though, not weak.

The longevity is a bit better than the sillage. I get it to stick around for just over 7 hours on my skin. Now, that last hour or so…is a skin scent. Yet, it is still there and this Ariana Grande perfume didn’t just vanish after a few hours.

Seasonally, this will be best in the spring and summer months. However, it wouldn’t feel out of place elsewhere. I wore it outside in the mid-50s Fahrenheit and it actually hung beautifully in the crispy air.

This is one of Ariana Grande’s most versatile perfumes that she has released. Previous releases have been too sweet or too youthful for many women to full enjoy. This one has the sweetness without it being overwhelming.

It’s got a fairly candy-like pear note, plus vanilla, but it doesn’t run wild with the sugary qualities. God is a Woman stays clean and doesn’t have a heaviness that many gourmands get.

This is a good daily wear. Still probably not a formal fragrance, but you could wear it in a wide variety of scenarios. It’s attractive, not a sexy night club beast. The pear note is a nice draw, though.

Overall Impressions of God is a Woman

Overall, do I like this perfume. I do. It’s an attractive fruity/musky/floral scent that is versatile and has a fairly unique smell (even if it has a similar structure to others).

I like that the pear note got a chance to shine by itself, after being used in another (1, at least) Ariana perfume. It’s juicy and very sweet with a nice wrapping from the vanilla. It has the powdery/creaminess with the vanilla and orris, but those qualities stick in the background.

You’re going to get a fresh heavily fruity weighted fruity/floral. Actually, more of a fruity/musk perfume with floral highlights and a woodsy cedar base.

God is a Woman does have a lighter, somewhat sheer sillage to it. Still, I think people have been unfair in the performance criticisms. For me, it performs just fine. It’s not a bomb or a marathon performer. 7 hours is good enough for what this is.

This Ariana scent offers a change of pace and some more maturity versus other fragrances, released earlier in the catalogue.

Is it a must have? Probably not for most people. But it would absolutely be enjoyable for a wide range of people. This does have mass appeal, in a subtle and easy to wear way.

The percentage of early negative reviews have kind of skewed the perception of this perfume, it’s not bad at all. It’s good to very good, depending on your enjoyment of pear. Worth trying.

Light Blue Pour Homme Eau Intense vs. Forever

by

Light Blue is a seemingly endless line of fragrances from Dolce & Gabbana. I mean, why quit when you’re so successful with the formula? The latest edition is Light Blue Forever Pour Homme, which made waves in the summer of 2021.

It’s a well-liked cologne, but how does it compare to another popular option from the line, Eau Intense? In this post, I will compare the two and declare the best option.

Tale of the Tape: Light Blue Eau Intense vs. Forever Pour Homme

Light Blue Forever

Notes include: grapefruit, violet leaf, white musk, vetiver, ozonic accord

Click here to try: Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue Forever for Men by Dolce & Gabbana Eau De Parfum,3.3 Fl Oz

My Full Review: Light Blue Forever

Light Blue Eau Intense

Notes include: mandarin, frozen grapefruit, juniper, aquatic accord, amber woods, musk

Click here to try: Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue Intense Eau de Parfum Spray for Men, 1.6 Ounce

My review: Light Blue Eau Intense

Opening

Eau Intense has similarities to the original Light Blue, much more so than Forever. It kicks things off as a citrus scent with its mix of grapefruit and mandarin orange.

The scent has a chilly aroma, as the grapefruit note is ‘frozen’. It doesn’t have the peppery accord of the original.

In its place, I pick up a light juniper note. The main difference from the original is the inclusion of an aquatic accord. It is slightly salty but not really oceanic, more like sitting by a hotel pool, while on an island. You pick up aquatic elements of sea and pool water.

The juniper and amberwood in Eau Intense give it very fresh profile, that is great to spray on during the summer.

Light Blue Forever also starts with a grapefruit note. That’s it’s main attraction and it smells much more realistic and fresh versus the one found in the rest of the series.

Beneath that, is a blue-green ozonic accord that adds a watery freshness, and the ever-increasing violet leaf.

Which is better? I enjoy both, but I think that Forever has the better start to things. That grapefruit note, while not my favorite aroma in the world, is absolutely great in just how much like the real thing it smells like.

This first category goes to Forever.

Edge: Forever

Projection

Light Blue Eau Intense starts off pretty powerfully and it has the ability to project itself pretty far from the skin.

That first hour or so, it is certainly possible to overspray and take over a room. Though, it does settle and become much more of a moderate fragrance for the rest of the wear.

Forever opens up with that nice grapefruit burst, though it’s pretty moderate as a whole. It never hits the same heights as Eau Intense and much of the wear will be spent near skin scent level.

You get a few hours of solid performance, then it will be a lighter cologne.

Eau Intense has the better sillage.

Edge: Eau Intense

Longevity

While, Forever isn’t the best with how it projects, it actually does stick to the skin for quite a while in this lighter state. It gets me just over 7 hours of wear, with the first couple being in its moderate strength.

However, Light Blue Eau Intense gets me around 9 hours of wear, with a better ability to project. Between these two, Eau Intense clearly has the better performance.

 

Edge: Eau Intense

Versatility

Both of these fragrances are best in the summertime. They can both go casual and can fit in, for an office environment.

I do think that Forever, is the better of the two with how it can fit into those sorts of semi-formal circumstances in comparison to Eau Intense.

It’s a pretty close race and there is plenty of overlap. Forever does have a slight edge in when and where it can be worn.

Edge: Forever

Overall Scent

This is a close call to which of these two fragrances I prefer. Both of them have their strengths and are enjoyable in their own right.

Light Blue Forever is the new kid on the block and has already made a name for itself. I really do enjoy that opening act with the grapefruit note.

After that, it becomes a greener and woodsier scent and the grapefruit becomes just another part of the composition. Violet leaf and vetiver with some musk to boot. Once it has dried down, I’m not that enthralled with Forever.

Update: Forever has since been discontinued. It is still available online at some places. D&G came out with Italian Love the next year, which was a slightly different take on the formula (which I preferred), and can also serve as an alternative to Light Blue Forever.

Either way, you’ll now have to find both from 3rd party online stores, that may still have stock of each.

It smells fine, at that point, but is pretty weak with its sillage. I don’t hate it, but once the opening fades, the appeal is gone for me.

Eau Intense is a summertime workhorse. It starts off slower, but I think has a better smell overall. Not a huge margin, but I do like it better. Plus, I get 9 hours of solid performance.

I love the aquatic nature and freshness from the juniper note. Eau Intense is cold and clean reminding me more of sitting by the pool versus the ocean.

Between these two, I still give the edge to Eau Intense.

Winner: Eau Intense

Acqua di Gio Profondo Lights by Armani

by

Acqua di Gio flankers have become routine, especially as of late. Armani quickly followed up the release of 2020’s popular Profondo, with this year’s Profondo Lights. Being a fan of the series, I was excited to give this one a go and see if it was a worthwhile cologne to own. How does it smell? When should it be worn? Is AdG Profondo Lights worth a buy?

What does Profondo Lights Smell Like?

Profondo Lights

Notes include: cardamom, mandarin, patchouli, cedar, marine accord, vetiver, lavender, cypress, rosemary

My Full Review

I’ve said that Acqua di Gio Profondo was a green-ish blue scent. Well, Profondo Lights is much more toward the green end of the spectrum, with a touch of marine notes for its ‘blue’ aroma.

Cypress, cardamom, mandarin, and the marine notes open things up. I’m not a fan of the initial act of Profondo Lights, it’s bright, and reminds me of a smoother apple cider vinegar. Not nearly, as harsh and it fades away, but I really don’t like that smell.

Note: coming back to this review two months after the fact, the messy opening still doesn’t appeal to me. I gave it a chance to grow on me, but that never did.

I understand that they’re going to use the citrus note, but I think that the mandarin distracts too much here. Once it’s burned off some, you start to get the woodsy/herbal/aquatic blend and that’s when Profondo Lights shines as a standalone fragrance.

Rosemary, cypress, cardamom, and lavender to smooth things out. It’s woody, but not overly so. The herbal notes and the lavender really clamp down on making this overly fresh. At this stage, I really start to enjoy what Lights has to offer versus Profondo.

The cardamom is great on its own, separated from that initial mandarin burst. I would’ve liked it to have more of the focus, it would’ve been a smoother and more enjoyable experience.

This middle act lasts for an hour or two and what your left with, is a lighter version of Profondo. Really, the dry down is near identical, on my skin just a different intensity. Which is fine, as I like wearing Profondo.

Sillage, Longevity, and Versatility

The sillage here is pretty moderate for much of the wear. Then, it’s closer to a skin scent. The projection never seems to go beyond 4-5 feet, even at its peak. Not terrible performance, it’s okay, and worse than Profondo.

Update: Yep, that’s what it seems capable of. I’ve sprayed in on t-shirts across the room and on my skin…and it’s consistent in that range.

Profondo Lights lasts for 5-6 hours on me. That’s the extent of what it seems capable of. Both Profondo and AdG Profumo outdo it here. Really, kind of disappointing for the price you’re probably going to pay for a full bottle.

Update: Going through a few samples of Profondo Lights, the longevity really isn’t that great. Sometimes, I’ll get around 4-4.5 hours and occasionally it stretches to the full six. The part that really sucks, is the latter stages are the most enjoyable part, and it often doesn’t get the time to shine completely.

Seasonally, like Profondo, Lights is a spring and summer fragrance. Casual to semi-formal wear, mostly during the daytime. It’s really not any different from its predecessor in this regard.

It’s really going to have a limited use case for 4-6 months out of the year, for most folks. It’s not particularly sexy, but some people will find it to be attractive enough, and it obviously has some level of mass appeal with the AdG DNA.

Overall Impressions of Profondo Lights

Overall, do I like this fragrance? I like it, but I don’t love it. I do appreciate a greener take on the formula, but I hate the opening act, and it doesn’t add the much of a different vibe to be worth it…at it’s higher price at least.

The best part of the wear it the second wave, once the cardamom gets more of a chance to shine on its own. I like the pairing with the cypress and rosemary. Fresh, green, herbal, with an undercurrent of marine impressions.

It does end up favoring Profondo significantly, but it doesn’t surpass that one, in my opinion. Also, the performance is okay, but really not up to the same level. I’ve compared them head to head, multiple times, and it’s the same results.

This might be worth your time, if you like aspects of Profondo but want a woodier/green version of the scent. Maybe, if it makes it to the discounters at a more reasonable price, other guys could go for it.

As it stands? It’s fine, but nothing incredible. I tested this one thoroughly over two months and the needle never moved from my initial impressions of Lights. It’s pretty good, fairly expensive for what it is, and probably won’t be a must own for very many guys.