Burberry Hero EDT vs Hero EDP Comparison

Hero is a newer series from Burberry, coming on the heels of their Mr. Burberry line. It has been a pretty popular scent thus far, already producing an eau de parfum version following the initial EDT. The question is, how do these two colognes compare? What does each smell like? Which lasts longer? Which is actually the better scent?


Tale of the Tape: Hero vs. Hero EDP

Burberry Hero EDP

Notes include: pine needles, cedar, incense, benzoin, amber, olibanum

Click here to try: Burberry Hero EDP from Macy’s

My Full Review: Hero EDP


Hero EDT

Notes include: cedar, bergamot, juniper, black pepper

Click here to try: Hero EDT


Opening

Hero EDT starts things off with a lightly spiced, citrusy aromatic tone. The citrus note isn’t overwhelming, but it does have a major role in the start. Along with, the ever-present cedar accord, which will really dominate the latter parts of the wear.

But, early, the cedar and juniper will pretty much split duties. Aromatic, but a touch sweet and quite fresh. Black pepper isn’t highly concentrated in the blend. However, I do think that it is a great addition to the citrus and woods.

The opening of Hero EDP is fresh, smokier, and surprisingly still has a sweetness to it. It stems from the olibanum, in this addition, which can give off a level of fruitiness to the aroma. Apparently, the grapefruit has been stripped out of it.

EDP has plenty of resinous amber influences here. The early stages are more of a fuzzy impression and resinous, with the olibanum and benzoin notes. Then, it becomes a cleaner, warmer, and more straightforward amber.

Which is better? The opening of EDT is better to me. It’s fresh and mass appealing. Not overly complicated, but attractive. EDP’s opening act, is probably its weakest link, in my opinion.

Edge: Hero EDT


Projection

On me at least, I really don’t notice a difference between the higher EDP concentration and the EDT. After all, the are somewhat different formulas. Maybe the EDP has a better ability to project and leave a scent trail.

I don’t notice it at all, after testing out both of these colognes. If it is, pretty negligible, and both scents are above average but moderate.

Edge: Push


Longevity

Now, with the longevity, I can get between 8-9.5 of wear with the eau de parfum. Sort of a wide range, but it is certainly capable of hitting that upper limit.

Hero EDT, is also a pretty good performer, just with a lower ceiling. I get 7-8 hours of wear, on skin. With it being quite noticeable for most of that timeframe.

Not a huge blow out win, but EDP definitely lasted longer.

Edge: EDP


Versatility

Seasonally, EDP is an autumn and winter release. It can be somewhat cloying and isn’t all that great in the heat.  When it is cold out, Hero EDP is at its best.

With EDT, I feel a lot more comfortable extending it use case into the warmer days. It is one of those colognes which can work year round pretty much. I wouldn’t go with it on the hottest or coldest days, but outside of that EDT is better at fitting in.

Hero EDP skews towards being more of a nightlife or casual type of scent. Both of these scents probably skew towards younger guys. But, can be worn by anyone. I actually think EDT is the more versatile. Not a formal or super serious cologne. Very much a modern mainstream release, that can do almost anything else.

Edge: EDT


Overall Scent

Overall, which of these fragrances do I prefer? From the first time that I tried them both, I was already slightly leaning towards the original EDT.

After testing each out further? I’m still going EDT, except that margin only grew wider. I without a doubt prefer it to the EDP. The EDP is fine, it gets better in the dry down. Cedar, amber, dark, and smoky. The pine needles are an interesting touch, but it doesn’t do enough for me.

EDT. I think that opening act is just more captivating. The cedar, juniper, and citrus notes just work all together to produce something that is wholly enjoyable. It’s not a mind-blowing experience, but I’ve found myself wanting to wear Hero EDT consistently. I can’t say the same for EDP.

The performance of Burberry Hero EDT is good enough, that it doesn’t have an effect on my call between these two. I like them both, EDP does have that darker resinous woods going for it. I enjoy it to an extent, not as much as I might have thought.

Winner: Hero EDT

Light Blue Eau Intense vs. Versace Pour Homme

Light Blue Eau Intense and Versace Pour Homme are two of the more popular citrus based men’s fragrances over the past decade. Because of this, these colognes can often get compared to one another as potential buys. The question is, which fragrance smells better? Which lasts longer? Which actually is the top cologne option?


Tale of the Tape: Eau Intense vs. Versace Pour Homme

Light Blue Eau Intense

Notes include: mandarin, frozen grapefruit, juniper, aquatic accord, amber woods, musk

Click here to try: Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue Intense Eau de Parfum Spray for Men, 1.6 Ounce

My review: Light Blue Eau Intense


Versace Pour Homme

Notes include: bergamot, bitter orange leaves, geranium, sage, oud wood, mineral amber, tonka bean, musk, neroli

Click here to try: Versace Pour Homme Eau De Toilette Natural Spray 3.4 fl. oz.

My Review: Versace Pour Homme

FullSizeRender (40)


Opening

Light Blue Eau Intense starts off with citrus notes, bringing out a mandarin orange and frozen grapefruit note that is slightly different from the one in the original. It actually does have a great cold feeling to it, that is refreshing to wear.

The aquatic note is less of a salt marine type, but is joined by a nice juniper note. Colder synthetic water with plenty of that amberwood note coming from the base. I like it.

Versace Pour Homme opens up with a bitter orange leaf and bergamot note. It is a purer citrus distillation than is Eau Intense. Very fresh and neroli comes in, to pump that up even further.

Tonka and the greenish floral notes will emerge more later. Initially though, it is a very citrusy cologne.

Which is better? I actually like the way that Light Blue Eau Intense begins. It’s not a massive advantage, but I do have a slight preference towards the Dolce, early on.

Edge: Eau Intense


Projection

With old bottles of each, I would say that these two are pretty equal with their sillage and ability to project off of the skin.

But, with the latest batches that I’ve tried, I’d give the edge to Eau Intense. It seems to have held up better over the years

With that, Eau Intense is going to be in the 4-6 foot range, for most of the wear. Stronger at the start, but well ahead of newer bottles of Versace Pour Homme.

Edge: Eau Intense


Longevity

Light Blue Eau Intense remains a great performer for me. Other Light Blue’s only seem to stick around for 5-7 hours. However, Eau Intense will still hit over 9 hours for me. This formula really nailed this aspcet.

With Versace Pour Homme, I do only get 5-6 hours of wear out of it on skin. Not great. But, since I use both in the summertime, it’s not too concerning to not have it be an absolute beast.

Yet, Eau Intense wins this category easily.

Edge: Eau Intense


Versatility

Both of these fragrances are at their best in the warmer weather. But, I think that Versace Pour Homme is the more versatile of the two.

It’s a cologne that is a signature scent for many guys out there. It can be worn casually, out at night, even as a daily wear to work or school.

Eau Intense also has plenty of versatility, but it can feel too casual and too limited to the summertime versus Versace.

Edge: Versace Pour Homme


Overall Scent

Overall, which of these colognes do I prefer?

While I like the start of Eau Intense a bit more than Versace, and it’s better performance is something worth considering. I actually like the overall smell of Versace Pour Homme slightly more than I do Eau Intense.

I will gladly wear either of these, but the dry down of the Versace is better to me, especially once you get that tonka bean fully engaged and the citrus tones down some.

Eau Intense becomes musky and has that amberwood note, which can be bothersome to some. It can get annoying, at times, for me too.

Versace Pour Homme probably has a greater broad-based appeal for that reason too. Sure, you need to sacrifice some on the performance end, but it’s an easy scent to plug into anyone’s rotation. It gets the nod here.

Winner: Versace Pour Homme

16 Similar Perfumes to Lost Cherry

Lost Cherry has become a mass appealing favorite from the Tom Ford line. Over the past few years, people have been taken by it, but often don’t want to pay the high price to acquire it.

Also, some people want something that smells similar, but is distinct from the popular perfume. On this page, I am going to post the fragrances that I feel are close to Lost Cherry, near matches, or in between, and update it as I come across more options.


Key Takeaways of Lost Cherry Alternatives

Here are some of the highlights of this post, for those in a hurry. I go into much greater depth further down the page, on these options and many others.


Favorite Perfume Alternatives to Lost Cherry

The Dua Cherry

Popped Cherry by Dua– Popped Cherry from The Dua Brand is, based on the name alone, obviously designed to smell close to the Tom Ford fragrance. And, it does a very good job at it.

If you want a pure clone type of recreation of Lost Cherry, this is a great one to go with. It is not only cheaper, but also has a good performance, as well. The cherry liqueur, almond, and other gourmand notes blended together in its syrupy goodness.

Also, like other popular scents that Dua produces, they also have blends available that mix and match Popped Cherry with other perfumes. So, if you want to try a remix, there’s those too.

That being said, comparing my bottle of the Dua with the actual Lost Cherry, it isn’t an exact 1 to 1 smell. Very close, however.

Lost Cherry has more of an amaretto-like mixed drink quality early on, that I likened to a Dr. Pepper sort of aroma. That and it’s a bit less powdery in the dry down. My Review of Popped Cherry


Less Boozy and Spicy Aroma

Ambery Cherry by Dossier Cherry and almond dominant, especially in the early stages. In some ways, this feels a bit sweeter than Lost Cherry, maybe a little less of that spiciness. Or what I refer to as the “Dr. Pepper” sort of aroma that the Tom Ford gives off.

With Lost Cherry, I pick up a more naturalistic cherry note and then one of those syrupy red cherries that are used in bars. Ambery Cherry goes with the more naturalistic one alone. Also, without the boozy note.

The heart gets a bit more floral and vanilla based, than the early stages. Jasmine, clove, and vanilla come on. Pretty much the same weighting with Lost.

But, outside of that, this is really very close to being a full on match of our target perfume. The performance is okay, but not spectacular. A very nice pickup for around fifty bucks.


Syrupy Fruit

Cherry Smash by Alt Fragrances– Another inspired take on the Tom Ford scent. Cherry Smash is an affordable option that really strikes as a near match of what we’re wanting.

The good thing about this one, is that you get the syrupy sort of cherry to go along with the more straightforward cherry aroma. Liqueur and the fruit itself. The cherry is the dominant note, as expected, but perhaps the almond is a bit weaker than in Lost.

Also, feels slightly creamy, at times. But, it’s dead on once the opening act has faded.

Cherry Smash doesn’t skimp on the performance, like Popped Cherry, it will last all day and has a solid sillage. The price is right with Smash, providing a great cheap alternative to the expensive Ford.

lost cherry clone


Similar Almond and Cherry

Fructus virginis 1.8oz (Alexandria Fragrances) 55 ML– Fructus Virginis isn’t the same as Lost Cherry, but it does have plenty of overlap with notes and an overall similar style. Rose, cherry, and musk are some of the more prominent features of this one.

To me, Lost Cherry has more of a cherry Dr. Pepper sort of aroma. This also has a ton of cherry, almond, and more sweetness. But, doesn’t have that same exact vibe. It is darn close, but Fructus does have its own distinct style ultimately.

Also, while this really loads up on the syrupy (bar) cherry aroma. Lost Cherry has a second wave, with a more naturalistic one. But, if you want another cherry/almond option, this is a good one to check out.


Cherry Sin

Sinful by Oakcha– Here’s another take on the Lost Cherry formula, this time from Oakcha. I haven’t tried this one out just yet, but I’m putting it on the list as another potential ‘inspired’ option for people to check out.

Oakcha has plenty of good inspired takes on designer fragrances available, a ton of positive reviews, and the price is in line with the others listed above. So, give it a try, if you want one from this brand.


High End, Not Exact

Duchessa by Gritti– I’m going to include Duchessa on the list, even if it’s not nearly a match to the same level as the others on this list. It has a stronger, sour cherry than does Lost. Not nearly as syrupy. Plus, it shares the almond note.

Yet, this one is probably somewhat overpriced and doesn’t have the booziness. Nevertheless, it’s still a really attractive perfume. The cherry is joined by a bitter orange note, the surrounding fragrance comes across like marzipan and there is a light sprinkling of powdered cocoa.

It’s warm with highlights of patchouli, a dash of cloves, and a light iris note which kind of comes and goes. Also, this is really hard to come by (in the US, at least). You can usually find some decants online, which I’d recommend before committing to a full bottle.


Smell Lovely

Lovely Cherie by Maison Alhambra– This is another affordable option that serves as an ‘inspired blend’ of the Tom Ford original. Maison Alhambra does a pretty good job with most of their scents and this is one of the better examples.

The cherry here is sweet and leans more toward the syrupy end of things, maybe even more than what you get with Tom Ford. It doesn’t have the same amaretto sort of booziness, more of a pure almond note, with an added smokiness to it.

Good performance and plenty of value for the money, if you can find a bottle.


Similar but Does its Own Thing

Cherry Syrup by Proad– Very much a thicker cherry with boozy elements (rum here). Yet, this doesn’t try to exactly mimic Lost Cherry. Instead, you get less of a nuttiness and an additional saffron note. Also, Cherry Syrup smells like a sweeter aroma.

The use of rum and oak, along with the sweetness gives it a slight resemblance to Angels’ Share. It’s faint, but it is there.

Cherry with a boozy spice and vanilla. That saffron note adds something different to the mix from our target perfume. A good choice, if you want something along the same lines, but doesn’t try to be exact.


Close Style from Dior

Fève Délicieuse– Okay, this Dior isn’t the same as Lost Cherry. But, I think this is another great fragrance with quite a similar style, and something many folks will enjoy.

It is also a warm and sweet fragrance, with a tonka bean really highlighting. But, beyond that, you also get cherry…and vanilla, prailine, coffee, chocolate, and caramel. But, while it has all that, it isn’t a baked goods-like aroma. Feve remains dynamic.

There are powdery qualities, lavender and rose touches, and a rather distinct herbal spiciness in the dry down. This one is kind of different, but feels familiar. I never tried the older version of Fève Délicieuse, so I’m not entirely sure if it changed a great deal or what. But, this is a great little perfume.


Smoky Fruit

Lovefest Burning Cherry– This Kayali offering has a very similar opening to Lost Cherry, but probably a bit more syrupy and thick. Our target note is joined by raspberry and the sweet gourmand smell of praline.

Yet, it will shift into something that is more influenced by amber, an incense smokiness, and a big dose of woods. This really separates Lovefest Burning Cherry from the other options of the list.

Palo santo and guaiac wood play a large role in this one, with the slightly resinous amber note. The cherry will stick around, while the other notes burn off. More balsamic, less floral and powdery, even though it does feature heliotrope and a Damask rose.

This has a very light sillage. It does last well enough, but it’s going to stick closer to the skin, so just be advised before purchasing. Lovefest Burning Cherry Review


Punk Cherry

Cherry Punk by Room 1015– This is an interesting perfume to compare to Lost Cherry. They both have plenty of cherry and a boozy air about it.

But, this one gives you that super candy sweetness with a smooth leather/saffron combination and a burst of smokiness in the early stages.

Cherry Punk is syrupy and sweet, with added floral notes of jasmine and mimosa. Sichuan pepper gives it an early punch, that the Tom Ford doesn’t really have.

This syrupy/candy/soda like cherry is found in the Tom Ford, but balanced with a more naturalistic variety. Cherry Punk, just goes with the former.

This isn’t a 100 percent match or completely similar. Just one that you might enjoy trying out, if you want to go in a bit of a different direction than Lost Cherry, while not straying too far.


Another Inspired Cheapie

Amarena Cherry by Fragrenza– I haven’t gotten to try this one, as of yet. However, I want to include it on the list for those searching for a Lost Cherry alternative. It’s supposed to be quite good.

Here’s how their site describes Amarena, An intriguing blend of tart cherries, sensual rose, and enigmatic woody notes yields a delightfully stimulating cherry fragrance. The heart is a rich, boozy cherry liqueur with a sweeter, almond note and a flowery touch of Turkish rose and jasmine sambac.

Sounds pretty much like what it is we’re looking for here.

Update: I’ve gotten a hold of a sample of Amarena Cherry. It is legit, smells very close to what we want, maybe a tad less boozy. Overall, very nice option.


Overlaps, But Ultimately a Different Cherry

Prada Candy Gloss– The Prada Candy line has come out with a bunch of different formulations over the years. I like L’eau and Night, but Gloss, is the one that’s going to get you a fragrance in the same ballpark as Lost Cherry.

Now, I will say, it’s not the same. This is a distinct fragrance that shares: cherry, almond, vanilla, and a powdery heliotrope in the dry down. You won’t get booziness, this is more green with its cassis note, and it is very sweet in comparison to the Tom Ford.

The rose and peach notes do give this one a nice touch to really make it distinct. The performance is good and I think it’ll do better in warmer weather than Lost Cherry can.

The sugary candy name and lip gloss imagery, does hold true, and that’s what you should expect. Later, it gets muskier with plenty of floral notes and some amber too.

Pretty sure it’s been discontinued recently. So, if you want to try, move quickly before prices get outrageous.


Zara Fruitiness

Cherry Smoothie by Zara– This is another kindred fragrance, but not a complete match of our target.

Cherry Smoothie focuses more on the fruitiness with a bit more plum in the mix versus the Tom Ford. Also, the cherry is the fruit and not the liqueur version early on. So, you’re basically getting the same cherry throughout and not multiple types.

It lacks spice, the booziness, and some of the warmer thickness of Lost Cherry. You do get a nice and different floral mix, that is led by heliotrope, which gives it a good powdery quality.

The nuttiness of the almond comes through more at times. The sillage here is lighter and it doesn’t have the best performance, but this is a good option for cheap.


An Expensive Near Match

Cherry by Max Philip– Here’s another option that I’ve come across, but haven’t yet tried out. Cherry by Max Philip, looks like it’s got the notes that we’re looking for and is also fairly well regarded.

Cherry, liquor, almonds, plum, etc. The questions I have come less from the ingredients (it should be 85+% of what you get with the Tom Ford, at least) and more from the potential quality of the perfume.

Also, it costs almost as much as the real thing. At that point, just get the Tom Ford, if that’s what you want.


Cherry with Different Highlights

Cherry Fever by Lunio– Another one that isn’t an exactly smelling like Lost Cherry. However, it shares lots of notes with the Tom Ford.

The main difference is the note strengths are sort of inverted. So, while Lost Cherry has patchouli, cinnamon, amber, and sandalwood…with Cherry Fever those ingredients are given prominence alongside the cherry.

No booze here, more amber and spicy highlights. A newer release, that you have to order from Europe.

Utopia Vanilla Coco | 21 by Kayali

Utopia Vanilla Coco 21 is one of the more popular scents from the Kayali lineup.  Probably not the top of the list, but it is a sought after scent. Being one of the vanilla perfumes from the brand, it often comes down to deciding between this and Vanilla 28. How does this one smell? Does it last long? Is it worth a try?


What does Utopia Vanilla Coco Smell Like?

Notes include: pear, jasmine, coconut, sandalwood, vanilla Bourbon

Click here to try: Utopia Vanilla Coco


My Full Review

Utopia starts off without it focus being on the vanilla note. Instead, this one is lighter and sparkles with a lovely pear blossom note and some assorted citrus, lurking in the background.

Aside from those notes, the coconut is playing a stronger role in this opening act, while jasmine joins the citrus in the background.. At first, it’s more of a secondary role, but will gradually take over for that pear blossom.

About 30-45 minutes in, the fruitier aspects of this will wane. Vanilla and coconut are now the leaders and the other notes are simply providing a freshness to keep it from becoming a thicker and creamier scent.

Sweet, fresh, and dry. Sandalwood is basically the only other note that has any real effect on how this smells. It’ll basically be a vanilla and sandalwood mix, with coconut, and mostly the jasmine still hanging on.


Sillage, Longevity, and Versatility

Like others from Kayali, this one isn’t going to be a heavy, scent trail leaving bomb. For the first hour or so, it does have a nice amount of projection and can leave some scent hanging in the air in your wake.

After that, it’s going to be sticking closer to the 3-5 foot range. Not too bad and I didn’t find Utopia to be completely weak. But, it will be a fairly light perfume for most of the wear.

The longevity is somewhere in the 5-6 hour range for me. Not going to be an all-day affair, if you want longer, be sure to bring some more with you for re-application. It’s pretty mid-range like the others in the line.

Seasonally, this is a vanilla fragrance that can work in the summer. I’d say it’s probably best in the warmer temperatures of late spring than the absolutely sidewalk melting days. Though, it’s still pretty good there as well. Can absolutely venture into the fall.

It’s a versatile wear. Good with other perfumes as a part of a layer, while being able to stand alone. It’s fine during the daytime as a casual wear or even one that can be used in the office. Very pleasant and likeable.


Overall Impressions of Utopia Vanilla Coco

Overall, do I like Utopia Vanilla Coco? Yes, I think it’s one of the better perfumes from Kayali. However, I prefer the smell of Vanilla 28 to this one. Between those two, I’d go with that before choosing this.

But, I do think that this one is a good pickup for those who want a lighter, fresher, and less vanilla dominant scent. Or, for those who want something which is a great candidate for layering with other perfumes.

The pear blossom with the coconut and lighter vanilla in the opening is lovely and the sparkling lightness is a joy to have around. The latter stages are more focused on that vanilla note and not as inspiring.

The performance is pretty mid. Don’t expect to be dealing with an absolute beast. It’s passable, just not great.

Utopia Vanilla Coco is one to try from Kayali. Not their absolute best, but in the upper half of their offerings for sure.

Light Blue Pour Homme Living Stromboli by D&G

Light Blue Pour Homme has spawned off about a dozen flanker fragrances since its release. One of the earliest ones was 2012’s Living Stromboli. I had never tried this scent out, but as I’ve been working my way through this D&G series, I sought it out. I was able to find a bottle for $50 to test out. How does it smell? Does it last long? Is Living Stromboli worth a try?


What does Light Blue Living Stromboli Smell Like?

Notes include: pink pepper, citrus, water notes, geranium, vetiver, amber, patchouli


My Full Review

Living Stromboli opens up with it’s pink pepper note out, in full effect. Yes, it’s a warmer and spicier type of aquatic fragrance, especially early on. It is interesting, however, how vetiver and patchouli are the two notes that I also get a lot of in this beginning.

The patchouli isn’t nearly as heavy, just giving this a light earthiness, sitting underneath the calone aquatic notes. Vetiver and the pink pepper are pretty dominant on my skin giving this a drier freshness, with some almost smoky elements.

The citrus here, isn’t out in front, as it is in many of the other Light Blue flankers. It’s there, just in a supporting role, seemingly diluted in the watery aspects of this cologne.

Further along, Stromboli moves into its more aquatic phase. The patchouli and vetiver really back off in this part. Geranium and amber emerge to join that pink pepper note, which is present throughout.

This isn’t oceanic and salty, as something like Swimming Lipari is. No, more of a thinner ‘blue-ish’ aquatic smell. Clean and synthetic, just not a marine-like sea water.

The final dry down is a mix of the water and amber. It’s much less spicy on the skin, more of an aromatic fresh feeling. Still a sense of dryness from those note, just much less intense.


Sillage, Longevity, and Versatility

Sillage wise, it’s a lighter moderate scent. About 45-60 minutes of wear, in which it will project well, and leave a scent trail in one’s wake.

After that, it’s a lighter cologne that’ll project about 2-4 feet from the skin. It’s about what I expect with these Light Blue flankers. Even if, this one is constructed differently, the EDT still have about the same strength.

On my skin, Living Stromboli will stick around for about 6.5, maybe 7 hours in total. Again, in line with the others from Dolce & Gabbana.

Seasonally, we’re going late spring and summer for this one. Obviously, as a refreshing aquatic, this is when it’s going to be at it’s best and most useful. Outside in the warmth, Living Stromboli has a lively and blue ozonic aroma that is nice to catch a whiff of.

Mostly going to be a casual one to wear around during this season. Stromboli is a daytime wear, that could venture out into the evening, even if it’s not a nightlife beast in its main use case.


Overall Impressions of Living Stromboli

Overall, do I like Living Stromboli? It’s fine. It’s a fairly simple spicy fresh aquatic fragrance. Something pretty different from the rest of the entries in the Light Blue Pour Homme lineup.

The pink pepper note works fairly well, but I’m not too enthralled by it leading the way. I do like this sort of calone-laced aquatic, but I probably would’ve preferred a citrus-led formula with the spices playing support, instead of what it actually is.

Still, the dry down is pretty appealing, when the spices are somewhat muted. An ambery aquatic aroma that hangs lightly in the air. Somewhere in the middle of the pack, as far as Light Blue Pour Homme editions go.

It’s not too amazing, but may be worth a try for guys who this formula sounds interesting to. There aren’t a ton of bottles left floating around. Though, the one’s that are, have been priced affordably. Better options exist, but this isn’t a massive disappointment for the $50 I paid.